Cases 31 - 40 of 363
Dickson v. Hochul et al
as 8:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Paul Tonko, Michelle Hinchey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Duncan v. SelectQuote Insurance Services Inc.
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michele Duncan
Defendant:
SeletQuote Insurance Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Michelle Sullivan v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
as 23-131
Petitioner:
MICHELLE SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, HOLDEN SHERIFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SHERYL ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Naharaja v. Koch et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kumar Naharaja
Defendant:
Thomas Kenneth Koch, Thomas Gregory Cooney, Carter Davidson Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 a Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
POLIDI v. MENDEL et al
as 1:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
