Cases 41 - 50 of 144
Larry Maybin v. Deputy Morrison
as 19-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY PERCELL MAYBIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY LONG, DEPUTY MARTIN, DEPUTY MCBRYER and others
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-6964
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
Yuri Stoyanov v. Raymond Mabus
as 19-1502
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHER MACY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commander of NSWC, WILLIAM SNYDER, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 20 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YURI J. STOYANOV
US v. Keith Long
as 19-4325
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH DARRELL LONG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Von Long v. Keven Soggs
as 19-6651
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVEN BRADLY SOGGS
Defendant:
JAMES C. GALMORE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM VON LONG
Lewis-Long v. Courthouse Pawn Shop, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ginger Sang Lewis-Long
Defendant:
Courthouse Pawn Shop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
US v. Bennett Long
as 19-4192
Defendant / Appellant:
BENNETT KIRK LONG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Jonathan Long
as 19-4142
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN C. LONG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Capps v. Oconee County Sheriff's Office
as 19-1201
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LONG, JUSTIN PELFREY, ANN MACON SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL G. CAPPS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
