Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Yarid v. Harman et al
as 3:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
George Alexander Yarid
Defendant:
Layton Harman, Robert Rooney, John Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Williams v. Murray et al
as 3:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Murray, Elizabeth Freeman-Greene and Peter S. Gilchrist
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
US v. Donte Freeman
as 12-6162
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONTE CHERON FREEMAN
US v. Donte Freeman
as 11-7457
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONTE CHERON FREEMAN
US v. Kelvin Freeman
as 11-7440
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KELVIN FREEMAN
Freeman v. Carvis et al
as 5:2011cv00611
Plaintiff:
Mark Elliott Freeman
Defendant:
Hugo Carvis, John Hess, Hess Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc et al
as 1:2011cv02437
Defendant:
Constellation Energy Group, Inc, Mayo A. Shattuck, III, James R. Curtiss and others
Plaintiff:
W.C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Constellation Energy Group, Incorporated et al
as 1:2011cv02165
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Defendant:
Constellation Energy Group, Incorporated, Mayo A. Shattuck, III, Yves C. De Balmann and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States ex rel. Tamika Nottingham, et al v. Delores Freeman Thomas, et al
as 4:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES , Commonwealth of Virginia and Tamika Nottingham
Defendant:
New Season Clinical Services, LLC, Delores Freeman Thomas and Jane Does #1-99
Movant:
UNITED STATES
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
