Cases 1 - 10 of 42
US v. Shanena McCall
as 24-4276
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHANENA INEZ MCCALL, a/k/a Chubbs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Blue v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Tanya Blue
Defendant:
Charlise Jeffreys, Nicole Dunn, Patricia McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
US v. Jonathan McCall
as 23-4335
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARCUS MCCALL
Dickson v. Kahn et al
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Kahn, Jill S. Polk, Aaron Poindexter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
US v. Steven McCall
as 22-6350
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN MCCALL
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, The et al v. McMaster et al
as 3:2021cv03302
Plaintiff:
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, The and Taiwan Scott
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Harvey Peeler, Luke A Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Koon v. Timothy Clark
as 21-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY CLARK, JORDAN WILLIAMS, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant:
NURSE SARAH LENTZ, DOCTOR SEAN JONES, TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Robert Koon v. Michael McCall
as 21-7076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL, CHARLES WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT ROBYN TAYLOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
