Cases 1 - 10 of 27
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 21 Welfare Fund et al v. Harrisburg Glass LLC
as 1:2023mc00042
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 21 Welfare Fund and Joseph Ashdale
Defendant:
Harrisburg Glass LLC
Garnishee:
Primis Bank
John Coble v. Lake Norman Charter School, Inc.
as 21-1737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN COBLE, on behalf of minor child J.H.C. and ROBIN COBLE, on behalf of minor child J.H.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKE NORMAN CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., RICK BUCKLER, Board Chairman, LESLIE FOGARTY, Board Vice-Chairman and others
Kenneth Wilson v. Gordon Painter
as 21-1083
Defendant / Appellant:
GORDON J. PAINTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH WILSON
US v. Toby Painter
as 21-4013
Defendant / Appellant:
TOBY PAINTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Coble v. Lake Norman Charter School
as 20-2206
Defendant / Appellee:
RIDGELY CHAPMAN, Board Member, STEPHANIE PAINTER, Secretary and Board Member, ELIZABETH TIMKOVICH, Board Member and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN COBLE, on behalf of minor child J.H.C. and ROBIN COBLE, on behalf of minor child J.H.C.
Merck & Co., Inc. v. FWK Holdings, LLC
as 20-432
Respondent:
THE RETIRED FIREFIGHTERS' SECURITY BENEFIT FUND OF THE UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 49 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, WALGREEN CO. and others
Petitioner:
SCHERING CORPORATION, SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ZETIA (EZETIMIBE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Patrick v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades et al
as 2:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Richard Patrick
Defendant:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades-District Council 53, Daniel J. Poling and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
