Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Bui v Smyth, et al
as 1:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Khai Bui
Defendant:
Sefton Smyth and Abdul Alshaer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
68th Street Site Work Group v. Airgas, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03385
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company Inc., Lear Corporation, Norris Automotive Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
68th Street Site Work Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 Comp Environ Recovery Comp & Liability Act (CERCLA) - Civil Proceedings
Helga Cohen v. US
as 19-1080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PARK, JANE MARSHALL, KRISTA PARROTT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smyth County, Virginia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00028
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Smyth County, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Chubirko v. Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00502
Plaintiff:
John Chubirko
Defendant:
Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc, Sue Breckenridge, Rick Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Gregory Smyth
as 08-4308
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY SMYTH
US v. Mark Smyth
as 08-4300
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK SMYTH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
