Cases 1 - 10 of 21
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 21-6678
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Manager of Offender Management Services, VADOC, G. KELLETT, Unit Manager, G.E.O., DR. WILLIAMS, G.E.O., LVCC Eye Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court
as 21-6662
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RATZ, JOSEPH M. TEEFY, Judge, ATTORNEY TERRY DRISKILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Kevin Krebs
as 21-6657
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD VORHIS, Assistant Attorney General, SUPERINTENDENT, Virginia State Police, MARK HERRING, Virginia Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Charles Campbell v. Hollie Bennett
as 19-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. CATHERINE A. STONE, MR. CHARLTON B. HALL, MR. DEAN GRIGG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. CAMPBELL
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 19-6313
Defendant / Appellee:
CLERK DUDLEY, S. SIMONS, A. MOORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Jones v. Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board et al
as 8:2018cv01886
Plaintiff:
Julie M Jones
Defendant:
Dianne Whitten, Thomas H Whitten, Sr and Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8477
In re Rodney M. Jones
as 1:2017mc00452
Respondent:
Rodney M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In re Antoini M. Jones
as 1:2016mc00763
Respondent:
Antoini M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Blanda v. Martin & Seibert, L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv00957
Plaintiff:
Christine Blanda
Defendant:
Martin & Seibert, L.C. , Walter M. Jones, III , Geoffrey A. Haddad and others
Counter_claimant:
Walter M. Jones, III , Nikki Moore Gress , Geoffrey A. Haddad and others
Counter_defendant:
Christine Blanda
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
