Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Ruth Condori Coaquira v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1975
Petitioner:
RUTH SANDRA CONDORI COAQUIRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ruth Smith v. SunPath, Ltd.
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUTH SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNPATH, LTD.
Dibble v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02905
Plaintiff:
Robert William Dibble
Defendant:
William F. Planer, Ruth B. Cassidy, Malik H. Aluqdah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WOODARD et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WOODARD and RUTH WOODARD
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Tunney v. Tunney
as 1:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Ruth K.M. Tunney
Defendant:
Shane H. Tunney
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Beatrice Rivera v. Arlington County Department of Human Services
as 22-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEATRICE RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ARLINGTON COUNTY JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURT, RUTH SELLASSIE and others
Rivera v. Arlington County Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Rivera
Defendant:
Arlington County Department of Human Services, Theresa Young, Arlington County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Counts v. Cooper
as 8:2022cv01509
Plaintiff:
Ruth C Counts
Defendant:
Mr Cooper
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Ruth Martinez-Rodas v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1220
Petitioner:
RUTH KEAN MARTINEZ-RODAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Smith v. SunPath, Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ruth Smith
Defendant:
SunPath, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
