Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wood et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04924
Plaintiff:
Mark Wood, Anthony Donisi, Gary Byington and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.28 Acres of Land, Owned by Alan R. Hartman
as 7:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.28 Acres of Land, Owned by Alan R. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Alfaro et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Alfaro, Bonnie Anz, William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Branham et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 3:2018cv02932
Plaintiff:
Todd Boster, Corine Jeffreys, Janice Wright and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A, Agnes E. Poe, Elizabeth A. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Branham et al v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03072
Plaintiff:
Sean Branham , Anna Eagan , Sadie Hartman and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thirty-Four Marketplace, LLC v. Hartman
as 1:2011cv02015
Plaintiff:
Thirty-Four Marketplace, LLC
Defendant:
Philip David Hartman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dillahunt v. City of New Bern et al
as 4:2008cv00056
Defendant:
City of New Bern, WALTER HARTMAN and MICHAEL W. AVERY
Plaintiff:
Norris G. Dillahunt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
