Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Stice et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01372
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Stice, Rudolph Stone, Ernest Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mitchell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00609
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Mitchell, Robert Hendren, Ralph Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Van Alstine et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06831
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Van Alstine, Samuel Mumley, Jerry Mosqueda Muniz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04925
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Moore, James Jenkins, Elizabeth Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.47 Acres of Land, Owned by Odell Wade Hutson, Jr., Evelyn Jeanette Hutson Kirby, Michael Douglas Hutson, and Sandra Ruth Hutson Gammon, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LL
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
6.47 Acres of Land, Owned by Odell Wade Hutson, Jr., Evelyn Jeanette Hutson Kirby, Michael Douglas Hutson, and Sandra Ruth Hutson Gammon, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Askew's Day Care, Inc. et al v. City of Kinston, et al
as 4:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Gordon Wade, Dr. Joseph Askew, Curtis Washington and others
Defendant:
City of Kinston, Jason Baker, Jackie Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 9.74 acres, more or less, in Bath County, Virginia et al
as 5:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Elizabeth G. Neely, 9.74 acres, more or less, in Bath County, Virginia and Wade A. Neely
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.713 Acres, More or Less, in Wilson County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 2760-36-6807.000, and Identified as Being a Portion of 119.8 Acre(s) Described in Book 2057, Page 80, et al
as 5:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Wade Raymond Finch, Heather Louise Finch, Pearl Lamm Finch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
