Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Furst v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10062
Plaintiff:
Brianna Furst
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lepe v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04641
Plaintiff:
Brianna M. Lepe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel et al v. Hayptman
as 3:2015cv01323
Plaintiff:
Brianna Samuel and Phyllis Samuel
Defendant:
Ana-Nereida Hayptman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huston et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv01519
Plaintiff:
Helen Huston , Roni Osterhoudt , Vickie Kanupp and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores et al. v. American Medical Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30425
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Flores , Patricia Cabrales , Mary Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Robinson
as 1:2013cv01288
Plaintiff:
Brianna M. Watson
Defendant:
Courtney Collins Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Maleah Busbee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 12-1247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALEAH BUSBEE
Plaintiff:
SARA OLVERA, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated, ABNER JOHNSON, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated, LILLIAN D. WITT, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH BELLINGER
Claimant:
EUGENE PENROW, JACOB IAN COURSEY, KEITH HUTTO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Movant:
MIDWEST EMPLOYERS CASUALTY COMPANY, DEBORAH MORRIS, MICHAEL MORRIS and others
Binns v. Binns et al
as 2:2010cv00428
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Binns
Defendant:
Brianna Binns, Tracy Lee Stork and Bonnie Lee Faucher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
