Cases 1 - 10 of 65
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Gilbert Cain v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03550
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cain v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Cain
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cain v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cain
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sanders v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cain Sanders
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Vargo et al v. Cain
as 1:2021cv02686
Plaintiff:
Amanda Susan Vargo and Virginia Mae Vargo
Defendant:
Edward Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cain v. Elicker et al
as 1:2021cv02261
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cain
Defendant:
Daniel Elicker, Cowan Systems, LLC and Cowan Equipment Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cain v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv00765
Plaintiff:
Heather L. Cain
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
