Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Buie v. Cone et al
as 3:2023cv05095
Plaintiff:
RaeQuann Dominique Buie
Defendant:
Jamie Bernard Cone, Jr. and Danielle Denise Roberts
Not Classified By Court:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv02338
Plaintiff:
Christopher Darnell Taylor
Defendant:
John Wayne Davis and Nellie Enterprises LLC
Interested Party:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Goodman v. Monroy
as 3:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
Olivia Goodman
Defendant:
Karen Beersherba Estr Monroy
Not Classified By Court:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aman v. Fotinos
as 1:2020cv01264
Defendant:
Michael Fotinos
Plaintiff:
Shirshah Aman
Interested Party:
Maryland Auto Insurance Fund, Geico Advantage Insurance Company and Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCADOO v. EGOLF et al
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
SONYA NICHOLE MCADOO
Defendant:
KENNETH A. COBB, CAROLINA PLASTICS, INC., KARL F. EGOLF and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creel et al v. Welch
as 4:2019cv02158
Plaintiff:
William Lonnie Creel, Jr and Bonnie Creel
Defendant:
John W Welch
Not Yet Classified:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry et al v. Gypsum Express LTD. et al
as 3:2018cv02704
Plaintiff:
William Fry and Jessica Fry
Defendant:
Kenneth Edwards, John Doe and Gypsum Express LTD.
Undetermined:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Nielsen v. Curtis Smith
as 09-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL K. NIELSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS R. SMITH, CRANDALL CORPORATION, JAN W. ANDERSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
