Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Chicago Title Company, LLC v. Wilton Re Services, Inc.-Aegon et al
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Company, LLC
Defendant:
Wilton Re Services, Inc.-Aegon and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Spivey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Patrica J Spivey
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Corporation Service Company, CT Corporation System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jones v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv02627
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Jones
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robey et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 5:2018cv00190
Defendant:
Brock and Scott, PLLC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Aaron Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Robey and Daniel Robey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hennon v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 5:2015cv00035
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Hennon and Melissa G. Hennon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Fisher v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv02365
Plaintiff:
Daphne Fisher
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Emmanuel Uzoma v. Barclays Bank, PLC
as 14-1630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL UZOMA and EMELIA UZOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
BARCLAYS BANK, PLC, EQUIFIRST CORPORATION, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. and others
Davis vs JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Monte'y D. Davis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Howard Beirman and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sammons v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2013cv32277
Plaintiff:
Lora Sammons
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carr v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2012cv05748
Plaintiff:
Judy B. Carr
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
