Cases 91 - 100 of 843
Jordan v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
203822 Wayne Jordan
Defendant:
Dereck Davis, State Treasurer, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Darden v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darden
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Erin Davis, Caleb Skipper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Grant-Davis v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2022cv01872
Plaintiff:
King Grant-Davis
Defendant:
Diana Ruhlig Hendrix, Art Milligan, Geona Shaw Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Abdullah et al v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Zayne Abdullah and Donnell Burgess
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, Welton Simpson, Jr., Byron Conaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Galloway v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Angelo Galloway
Defendant:
Mark S. Davis and Rebecca B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
