Cases 11 - 20 of 50,171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ude v. Amazon Retail LLC
as 8:2024cv02676
Plaintiff:
John Ude
Defendant:
Amazon Retail LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
Simmons v. Cooper
as 5:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Simmons
Defendant:
William C. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rubio v. Novak
as 3:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Yasmani Gurri Rubio
Defendant:
Judge David J. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smoot et al v. Winchester District Office et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Defendant:
Winchester District Office, Department of Social Services, JDR-Judge Nancey Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Smoot and D.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawbaker v. NEW BENEVIS SMILES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02682
Defendant:
NEW BENEVIS SMILES, LLC, Kristie Groover and NEW BENEVIS AFFILIATES, LLC
Plaintiff:
Taylor Hawbaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv05122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kaywan v. Aldi Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01633
Defendant:
Aldi Inc. and Aldi, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ahmadshehzad Kaywan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Murphy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv02665
Defendant:
US Attorney General Erek L. Barron, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Mary A. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
