Cases 11 - 20 of 26
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 16-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
William Scott Davis, Jr. v. Melanie A. Shekita
as 16-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
Raines v. Easley, City of et al
as 8:2015cv05093
Plaintiff:
Johnnelle J Raines
Defendant:
Easley, City of , Easley Police Department , Tim Tollison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 15-2287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Beverely Perdue, individually and in her official capacity as governor, and predecessor Mike Easley, individually and official capacity as governor, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, David Cook individually, and in his official capacity as county manager of Wake County, North Carolina and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 14-1495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
Davis et al v. Shekita et al
as 5:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr. and J.F.D.
Defendant:
Melanie A. Shekita, Michelle Savage, Danielle Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 11-1420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Beverely Perdue, Individually And in Her official Capacity as Governor, And Predecessor Mike Easley, individually And official capacity as Governor, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, David Cook individually, and in His official Capacity as County Manager of Wake County North Carolina and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
