Cases 21 - 30 of 607
Deafueh Monbo v. Harford County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1092
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ROBERT CAMPBELL, in his official capacity as an employee of Harford County Sheriff Office, UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wyatt v. Holmes
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Wyatt
Defendant:
Officer Trevor Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jones v. Thornton, et al
as 7:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Trey Jones and Antonio Trey Jones
Defendant:
Mr. James Haywood Thornton, Mr. William T Brady, Andrew Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Andrew Aquila v. SREIT Broad Vista Terrace, L.L.C.
as 23-2256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW A. AQUILA
Defendant / Appellee:
SREIT BROAD VISTA TERRACE, L.L.C.
Defendant:
STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC., KATHLEEN GREY, ANDREA PARADES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
