Cases 31 - 40 of 1,899
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
Nwosu v. Smith et al
as 8:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Adaeze Nwosu
Defendant:
Karla Smith, Kevin Hessler, Michael McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Keeley v. Hines
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keeley
Defendant:
Sheriff David R. Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Matilda Turner v. Micah Ennis
as 24-1189
Plaintiff:
MATILDA TURNER
Defendant:
MICAH ENNIS, Rowan County School Director, ROWAN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DAYMARK RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
