Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goodwin v. University of Maryland - College Park et al
as 8:2012cv03217
Plaintiff:
Abraham M. Goodwin
Defendant:
University of Maryland - College Park, Wallace D. Loh, Robert M. Specter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Goodwin v. Dillard's Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01831
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goodwin
Defendant:
Dillard's Inc , Gil Joseph, Johnny Vinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Simpson v. Lt Brandon Scott
as 11-6663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER G. SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON SCOTT, CHRIS CORNELL, Elberton County Sheriffs Office, WADE KING, Elbert County Sheriffs Dept and others
Toppin v. Chowan County et al
as 2:2011cv00024
Defendant:
Chowan County, C. Lewis Belfield, Jimmy Alligood and others
Plaintiff:
Angela L. Toppin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Scott et al
as 8:2011cv00618
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Simpson
Defendant:
Brandon Scott, Chris Cornell, Wade King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
N.T.,et al v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv00356
Defendant:
Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners , Andres A. Alonso , Dale J. Halterman and others
Plaintiff:
N.T. and Rachael Mooring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
