Cases 51 - 60 of 3,781
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Kaul et al v. Oetken et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul, Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
James Paul Oetken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Livermon v. State of Virginia et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juan Livermon
Defendant:
State of Virginia, Virginia State Troopers, John D. Mayoras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Dan Chacko v. Melissa Preston
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
DAN CHACKO
Defendant:
MELISSA PRESTON, DAVID POWELL, JOHN R. FORD and others
Elizabeth Roberts v. John Does 1 to 2
as 24-1241
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2 and CITY OF HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND, A Municipal Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Avens v. Dixon et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Avens
Defendant:
Faris C. Dixon, Jr., Vidant/ECU Health Medical Center, Dr. Karen Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Holley v. Woolard et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Betsy S. Holley and John L. Smith
Defendant:
Elvanetta S. Woolard, Pamela Fleming, Taneisha W. Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
