Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ray Kifer, Jr. v. Harry Crow, Jr.
as 23-1949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAY KIFER, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRY B. CROW, JR., as Administrator of the Estate of Landric Reid, DAVID SPENCER, in his individual capacity, KYLE BEAM, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
ANSON COUNTY and DAVID SCOTT BURROUGHS, in his individual capacity
Johnson v. Portsmouth Sherrif's Department et al
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Veronica M. Johnson
Defendant:
Portsmouth Sherrif's Department, Judge Douglass B. Ottinger, Judge William S. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hendricks v. Crowe et al
as 8:2020cv02799
Defendant:
Kevin Crowe, Pickens County Sheriff's Office, The and Pickens County
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Houpe v. Crow
as 5:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Willard Houpe
Defendant:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seldon v. Crow et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Philip Seldon
Defendant:
Cheyenne Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Britt et al
as 3:2013cv00568
Petitioner:
Charlette Dufray Johnson
Respondent:
Earl Britt, Jason Crowely, Gaston Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boddie v. Crowe
as 7:2012cv00525
Plaintiff:
Alexander Boddie, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Crowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
