Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Lemoine v. Horry Georgetown Technical College et al
as 4:2024cv06032
Defendant:
Kristin Sawyer, Jane Doe, Marilyn Murphy Fore and others
Plaintiff:
Leigha Lemoine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Christine Ritchie v. Lavi, Cedrone, Graver, Boyd & Disipio
as 24-1911
Defendant:
ANDREW PHAN, MARTHA J. KEEN, MAINE DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE RITCHIE
Kevin Murphy v. Mary Jackson
as 24-1904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DONNELL MURPHY
Defendant:
MARY A. JACKSON, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
Kevin Murphy v. Ruth Shuman
as 24-1905
Defendant:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, RUTH SHUMAN, Program Director and ANY STAFF MEMBER THAT WAS INVOLVED
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DONNELL MURPHY
Kevin Murphy v. State of Delaware Family Court
as 24-1906
Defendant:
DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and THE STATE OF DELAWARE FAMILY COURT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DONNELL MURPHY
Kevin Murphy v. Amy Anthony
as 24-1907
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DONNELL MURPHY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Motor Vehicles administrative State of Delaware workers and AMY ANTHONY, Director of Motor Vehicle Administration in the State of Delaware
Murphy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv02665
Defendant:
US Attorney General Erek L. Barron, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Mary A. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Murphy v. Barron et al
as 1:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Ruth Shuman, Erek L. Barron, Megan L. Micco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Murphy v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2024cv02667
Defendant:
Jodonna Alvarez and Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.