Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Ash v. Rubin et al
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff: Julian R. Ash
Defendant: Judge Julie R. Rubin and Stephanie Savoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ash v. Bredar
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff: Julian R. Ash
Defendant: Judge James K. Bredar and James K. Bredar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ash v. Russell
as 1:2023cv02873
Plaintiff: Julian R. Ash
Defendant: Judge George L. Russell, III and George L. Russell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Julian Ash v. OPM
as 23-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIAN R. ASH
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
United States of America v. Bristow et al
as 8:2023cv01355
Plaintiff: United States of America and Jason Haber
Defendant: Diane Bristow, Yael Ash, Gabriel Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Julian Ash v. OPM
as 23-1332
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIAN R. ASH
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04578
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ash v. Office of Personnel Management
as 1:2022cv00649
Petitioner: Julian R. Ash
Respondent: Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. Cherokee County et al
as 1:2021cv00274
Plaintiff: Ms. Tienda Rose Phillips, Mr. Stephen Ashe, C. A. and others
Defendant: Cherokee County, Cindy Palmer, Scott Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?