Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Riley v. United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. David R. Duncan, Bruce M. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01794
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Tigress McDaniel v. Michelle Bailey
as 17-2117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE FEIMSTER BAILEY, INFINITY BAIL BONDS, LLC, RICHARD HUFFMAN, a/k/a Dick Huffman and others
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2017cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Ervin v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, et al
as 5:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Randy B. Ervin
Defendant:
JPS Industries, Inc. and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Thelma Hewlett v. Permanent General Assurance
as 15-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THELMA L. HEWLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION and S&M AUTO SERVICE LLC
Hewlett v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
Thelma L. Hewlett
Defendant:
Permanent General Assurance Corporation and S&M Auto Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
