Cases 1 - 10 of 714
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ochar v. Ameris Bank
as 1:2024cv01258
Defendant:
Ameris Bank
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ochar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Perrin v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 8:2024cv02516
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Lower, LLC doing business as Homeside Financial
Plaintiff:
Shenique Neshelle Perrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lemaitre v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Defendant:
Brett Lawrence, Bank of America, NA and Jason Purser
Plaintiff:
Enjolique Cheri Lemaitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Defendant:
SUSAN DOYLE, in her official capacity as DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT 13, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ACTION NC and NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
