Cases 1 - 7 of 7
James v. Gibson
as 3:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Edwin C. James
Defendant:
Officer Steven M. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Forsythe et al
as 2:2021cv00567
Plaintiff:
Nicole Anastasia Gray
Defendant:
John W Kittredge, Donald W Beatty, Kaye G Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
family McQuatters v. The Equitable Life Mortgage and Realty Investors et al
as 3:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas family McQuatters
Defendant:
Equitable Life Mortgage and Realty Investors, The, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc, Finkle Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patricia Fletcher v. Linda Lamone
as 12-1104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA FLETCHER, Ms., TREVELYN OTTS, Mr., DONALD M. GLOVER, Mr. and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
C. JAMES OLSON, C. PAUL SMITH, RONALD GEORGE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA H. LAMONE, in her official capacity as State Administrator of Elections for the State of Maryland and ROBERT L. WALKER, in his official capacity as chairman of the State Board of Elections
Olson et al v. O'Malley
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
C. James Olson , C. Paul Smith , Ronald George and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fletcher et al v. Lamone et al
as 8:2011cv03220
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fletcher , Trevelyn Otts , Donald M. Glover and others
Defendant:
Linda H. Lamone and Robert L. Walker
Intervenor_plaintiff:
C. James Olson , C. Paul Smith , Ronald George and others
Amicu:
Maryland State Conference of NAACP Branches , Somerset County Branch of the NAACP , American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
