Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Keeley v. Hines
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keeley
Defendant:
Sheriff David R. Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Payne v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
C Ryan Payne
Defendant:
David R. Hines, Jonathan B Jones, James Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murphy v. Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Murphy
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University, ARAMARK Campus, LLC, Kelvin Tarakwasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
C. et al v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
J. C., L. C., Luis Catalan Reyes and others
Defendant:
David R. Hines, Thomas M. Woody, Rickey Dandridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hines v. Bost
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Brittany Hines
Defendant:
Domquise Bost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hines v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City
as 1:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Roberta L. Hines and Roberta L Hines
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Star v. Harrell et al
as 1:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Michael Star
Defendant:
Harrell, Don Hayes, Alexandria Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
