Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Derek Jarvis v. District Taco, LLC
as 23-1693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT TACO, LLC
Jarvis v. District Taco, LLC
as 8:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant:
District Taco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Removal from State Court - Civil Rights: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bittle v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte Transportation Center, Unemployment North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Raposo v. City of Westminster Police Dept et al
as 4:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Raposo
Defendant:
City of Westminster Police Dept, City of Westminster, CO, Shawn Porta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derek Jarvis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 22-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS and SHIRLEY J. PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jarvis v. Piercing Pagoda
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Derek N Jarvis
Defendant:
Zale Delaware, Inc. doing business as Piercing Pagoda and Piercing Pagoda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
