Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Adaeze Nwosu v. Karla Smith
as 24-1486
Plaintiff:
ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant:
KARLA SMITH, KEVIN HESSLER, MICHAEL MCAULIFFE and others
Nwosu v. Smith et al
as 8:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Adaeze Nwosu
Defendant:
Karla Smith, Kevin Hessler, Michael McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Richardson et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sherri M. Richardson and Morich Land Enterprise, Inc.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Lexus Financial Services Toyota Lease Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rivera et al v. Bay View Gardens/Newport Leasing et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linwood L. Rivera and Trayneka S. Carter
Defendant:
Bay View Gardens/Newport Leasing, B H management, Celtic Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00305
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goddard v. Apogee Retail LLC. et al
as 8:2019cv03269
Plaintiff:
Melvin M. Goddard
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Miraglia, Anthony Harmon, United State Park Police Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. CMG Leasing
as 7:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Taylor
Defendant:
CMG Leasing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
