Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
GUNTER v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY GUNTER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. , JASON JUNKINS , DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Bishop v. County of Macon, N.C.
as 14-2172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM BISHOP and DONNA J. BISHOP
Plaintiff:
FRANK PERRY, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MACON, North Carolina, MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT L. HOLLAND, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Macon County and others
Defendant:
MARSH USA, Inc.
John Bishop v. County of Macon
as 11-2021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM BISHOP and DONNA J. BISHOP
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MACON, North Carolina, MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT L. HOLLAND, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Macon County and others
Defendant:
MARSH USA, Inc.
Bishop et al v. County of Macon, North Carolina et al
as 2:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
John William Bishop , Donna J. Bishop and State of North Carolina
Defendant:
County of Macon, North Carolina, Macon County Sheriff's Department, Robert L. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bishop et al v. County of Macon, North Carolina et al
as 1:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
John William Bishop, Donna J. Bishop and State of North Carolina
Defendant:
County of Macon, North Carolina, Macon County Sheriff's Department, Robert L. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv03262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
