Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cobbs v. McMahon ****
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobbs v. McMahon
as 5:2024ct03012
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Naef v. County of New Hanover et al
as 7:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Christian Naef
Defendant:
County of New Hanover, Dr. Leshonda Wallace, Edward J. McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pagan v. Wilmington Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Pagan
Defendant:
Wilmington Police Department, New Hanover County, New Hanover County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Buoniconti et al
as 7:2021cv00059
Defendant:
J. M. Buoniconti, New Hanover County Sheriff's Department, New Hanover County and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn La'Derrick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOMASELLO et al v. GREENZWEIG et al
as 1:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
Patricia Tomasello and Martin Mcmahon
Defendant:
Michael T. Reilly, Jamie Greenzweig and Hasina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
