Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Uwa v. City of Newport News et al
as 4:2018cv00117
Defendant:
Kimbery Sills, City of Newport News, Joan Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Yodagent Wast-teuh Uwa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Theodore Justice v. Timothy Farley
as 14-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE JUSTICE, for Son
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County School Superintendent, MARY WATSON, Director Exceptional Children, AUGUSTUS B. ELKINS, Administrative Law Judge and others
Theodore Justice v. Timothy Farley
as 12-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County School Superintendent, MARY WATSON, Director Exceptional Children, JOE L. WEBSTER, Administrative Law Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
