Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shuler v. City of Hinesville et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Melodie V Shuler
Defendant:
City of Hinesville, Mayor Allen Brown, Assistant Mayor Ruan Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Vines v. Couglin et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael R Vines
Defendant:
Christopher Couglin, Lilly Wilder, Kristopher Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
John McSheffrey v. Lily Wilder
as 22-2131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MCSHEFFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities and RYAN T. DAVIS, in his individual and Official capacities
John McSheffrey v. Lily Wilder
as 22-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN P. MCSHEFFREY and JOHN MCSHEFFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities and RYAN T. DAVIS, in his individual and Official capacities
Wilder v. Rao et al
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
L. Douglas Wilder
Defendant:
Michael Rao, Fotis Sotiropoulos, Jacob Belue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
