Cases 1 - 10 of 2,720
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mueller v. Butcher
as 1:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Mueller
Defendant:
Daniel Butcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mueller v. Butcher et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Defendant:
Daniel M. Butcher and Kurt D Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lynch v. McCleod Regional Medical Center, Emergency Department et al
as 3:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
McCleod Regional Medical Center, Emergency Department, Chief of Emergency, Kiasha James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Parker v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. PARKER and PATRICE PARKER
Intervenor:
ALICE MEJIA
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Limited Partnership and NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Lynch v. Alba et al
as 3:2024cv02857
Defendant:
Jessica Alba, Jessica Aber or her Successor, Chief of Security and others
Plaintiff:
John D Lynch, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Kosciostio et al
as 3:2024cv02856
Plaintiff:
John D Lynch, II
Defendant:
Robert Kosciostio and Chief of Emergency Medicine 2014 Lexington Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
