Cases 91 - 100 of 161
Miller v. Fogle et al
as 6:2013cv01670
Plaintiff:
Clarence Scott Miller
Defendant:
Ms Fogle, Ms Barber and John H Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stuart Tompkins v. Department of Correction
as 13-6815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, OFFICER HUNT, OFFICER BARBER and others
Defendant:
J. N. VAUGHAN, BILL CARROL, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
US v. Chavius Barber
as 13-6546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHAVIUS MARQUETTE BARBER, a/k/a The Rock, a/k/a Cha-Roc, a/k/a KD
Kenneth Rivera v. William Byar
as 13-6271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, SCDC NUTRITIONIST MARCIA FULLER, EVELYN BARBER, Head Kitchen Supervisor and others
Al-Mujahidin v. Morton et al
as 9:2013cv00456
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin
Defendant:
Penny Morton, P Talbert, Leroy Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Herbert v. Met et al
as 3:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Robert Fletcher Herbert
Defendant:
James Met, Benjamin F Treaster, Athur L Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Barber v. Copeland et al
as 7:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Ovell T. Barber
Defendant:
Sgt. K. Copeland, S. Owens and M. Vargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Norwood Barber, Jr.
as 12-7873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NORWOOD WALLACE BARBER, JR., a/k/a Pee Wee Barber
Barber v. USA
as 3:2012cv00579
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Barber
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barber v. USA
as 5:2012cv80501
Petitioner:
Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
