Cases 111 - 120 of 131
Guess et al v. Ozmint et al
as 9:2010cv01934
Plaintiff:
Patrick Guess, James Thomason, Terrence McKee and others
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Anne Hall, Timothy Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Hirshman et al
as 1:2010cv01876
Plaintiff:
Warren Chase
Defendant:
Melvin Hirshman, Shawn T. Gaither, Howard S. Margulies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Dorsey v. Larry Edmond
as 10-6389
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD DORSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY EDMONDS, Warden
Thomas v. Amaghionyeodllue et al
as 1:2009cv01853
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Amaghionyeodllue, Ajala, Osilesi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Juknlis et al
as 1:2009cv01843
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Peter M. Juknlis, K. Dorsey, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Juknelis et al
as 1:2009cv01781
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Peter M. Juknelis, K. Dorsey, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Edmonds
as 7:2009cv00199
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Dorsey
Respondent:
Larry T. Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Filbert et al
as 1:2009cv00679
Petitioner:
Bruce Dorsey
Respondent:
William Filbert, Jr. and The Attorney General For The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas Dorsey v. Stan Burtt
as 08-8054
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS DORSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
STAN BURTT, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution
Respondent - None:
HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General
Nelson v. Kelly et al
as 0:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
Shawn Terrence Nelson, Jr and Shawn Terrence Nelson
Defendant:
Capt Jeanne Kelly, Lt Alton Hice, Lt Naomi Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
