Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Mack v. USA - 2255
as 1:2014cv00943
Petitioner:
Candis Mack
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014hc02044
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03554
Plaintiff:
Dwight Xavier Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Cayce Public Safety, Lexington County Sheriff Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plummer v. Riley et al
as 2:2012cv03412
Plaintiff:
Andrew Plummer
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Ms Middlebrooks, Ms Lecompt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McFadden v. Westley et al
as 3:2012cv02392
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden
Defendant:
Mr Westley, Officer of Kirkland's Law Library, Margaret Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Westley et al
as 0:2012cv02392
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden
Defendant:
Mr Westley , Officer of Kirkland's Law Library, Christopher Florain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutland v. State of South Carolinas et al
as 5:2012cv01110
Petitioner:
Walter Quinn Rutland
Respondent:
State of South Carolinas, Department of Corrections, William R Byars, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Argot v. Harden et al
as 4:2011cv02755
Plaintiff:
Candy Argot
Defendant:
Oliver Harden, Dana Smith, Columbia Regional Care Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
