Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Hinrichs v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017hc02088
Petitioner:
Thomas Carlisle Hinrichs
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6162
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clary v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03268
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Clary
Defendant:
Frank Perry, George Solomon, David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. USA
as 1:2016cv00255
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dewey Carlisle Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlisle v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv05200
Petitioner:
Darius Quinard Carlisle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tessa Childress v. City of Charleston Police
as 15-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TESSA R R G C CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress, filed as Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, LIEUTENANT CHITO T. WALKER, OFFICER SANDERS and others
Morning v. Dillon County et al
as 4:2015cv03349
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Morning
Defendant:
Dillon County , Dillon County Sheriff's Office , Major Hulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013hc02172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Carlisle v. United States of America
as 9:2009cv03240
Petitioner:
Joseph Carlis Carlisle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Lawrence Thompson v. Mary Carlisle
as 09-7863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY B. CARLISLE, d/b/a CEO Admin and KEITH DAVIS, d/b/a Security Off.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
