Cases 11 - 20 of 1,496
Mullinax et al v. Griffin et al
as 0:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mullinax and Tammy Beason
Defendant:
Michael Griffin, Daniel Taggart, Gary Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner:
Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary-Bey v. United States Federal Corporation et al
as 7:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent:
United States Federal Corporation and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R, A D R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Hancock, Jr. v. US
as 24-6368
Plaintiff:
GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marshall v. Sterling
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
Bryan P. Sterling, Director Bryan Stirling and Gary Kroger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gary Jones v. P. Kim
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
GARY JONES
Defendant:
P. KIM, Assistant States Attorney, GREGORY FISCHER, Assistant Public Defender, LISA FISCHELMAN, Assistant Bar Counsel and others
Robert Moore v. State of Maryland
as 24-6325
Petitioner:
ROBERT GARY MOORE
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND and WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
