Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Anderson v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2018cv03231
Respondent:
State Of South Carolina, Warden and South Carolina, State of
Petitioner:
James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eddie Golson v. Detective James Anderson
as 18-6204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE C. GOLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Individually and in their official capacities and DETECTIVE JAMES ANDERSON, of the Lexington County Sheriff's Department
Defendant:
JAMES R. METTS, BRIAN P. STERLING, STEPHANIE WILLIS and others
McClellan v. Haley et al
as 9:2016cv00949
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley and Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Golson v. James Anderson
as 16-6193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE C. GOLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ANDERSON, JAMES R. METTS, BRIAN P. STERLING and others
Anderson v. Warden Federal Correctional Institution Estill
as 4:2015cv03438
Petitioner:
Larry James Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Federal Correctional Institution Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McClellan v. Haley et al
as 9:2015cv02245
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley and Rick Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Haley et al
as 9:2015cv01615
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley, Rick Nolan, Cindy Truedale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Anderson-El v. Chief of Auxiliary Service
as 12-6935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANDERSON-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF OF AUXILIARY SERVICES
Anderson-El v. Young et al
as 5:2012hc02107
Petitioner:
James Anderson-El
Respondent:
Reuben F. Young and Lafayette Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Southwest Regional Jail Authority, Duffield Facility et al
as 7:2011cv00580
Defendant:
Dr. James Abrokwah, Superintendent Steve Clear, Dr. Draper and others
Plaintiff:
Steven James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
