Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Cephas v. MacDonald et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Cephas
Defendant:
Dr. MacDonald, Doctor Landower and Landrum Hsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jeffrey MacDonald
as 15-7136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY R. MACDONALD
William MacDonald v. Tim Moose
as 14-7326
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT MACDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM MOOSE
Respondent:
KEITH HOLDER
Albert Eichel v. MacDonald
as 12-7997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT CHARLES EICHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MACDONALD, Ms.; Chapline and BENNETT, Ms.; Major
William MacDonald v. Tim Moose
as 11-7427
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT MACDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM MOOSE
Respondent:
KEITH HOLDER, Probation Officer
James Blakely v. Robert Ward
as 11-6945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES G. BLAKELY, a/k/a Jimmy G. Blakely
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WARDS, Regional Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel Attorney, ANTHONY PADULA, Warden and others
Blakely v. Ozmint et al
as 4:2010cv00718
Plaintiff:
James G Blakely
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Robert Wards , David M Tatarsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
William McDonald v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7973
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT MCDONALD, a/k/a MacDonald
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
MacDonald v. Moose
as 1:2009cv01047
Petitioner:
William Scott MacDonald
Respondent:
Keith Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Jeffrey MacDonald
as 08-8525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY R. MACDONALD
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT, THE INNOCENCE PROJECT and NORTH CAROLINA CENTER ON ACTUAL INNOCENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
