Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Hommel v. Unknown
as 3:2019cv00386
Petitioner:
Brandon K. Hommel
Respondent:
U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio, Dr. S. Hughes Melton, Mark Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Field v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
as 3:2017cv00071
Petitioner:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Cynthia Mauser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Harris et al
as 7:2017cv00116
Defendant:
Ruffin Harris, Jr., James L. Knight, Atkinson Jr. Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Harris et al
as 5:2017ct03144
Defendant:
Ruffin Harris, Jr. , James L. Knight , Atkinson Jr. Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Syska v. Harrison et al
as 5:2017ct03115
Plaintiff:
Arron Syska
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , Obinnaya C. Umesi, M.D., Angela Bethea, PA-C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Northern Regional Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Moore
Defendant:
Northern Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical, Wexford Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Northern Regional Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Moore
Defendant:
Northern Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical, Wexford Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Maryland Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv03234
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Harris
Defendant:
Maryland Dept. of Corrections, Ohio Dept. of Corrections and John and Jane Does 1-28
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Harrison et al
as 5:2015ct03107
Plaintiff:
Marlene Gilbert
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , Markeith Council and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogel v. Harrison et al
as 5:2015ct03084
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Fogel
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , Michael Ramirez , Joshua Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
