Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Bridgeford v. DPSCS ADA Coordinator et al
as 8:2017cv02480
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Defendant:
DPSCS ADA Coordinator, Sec. of State Moyer and Dupty Sec J. Michael Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eldridge Hodges v. Betty Brown
as 15-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELDRIDGE EDGER HODGES
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. BETTY BROWN, Director of Chaplaincy Services and FRANK PERRY
Defendant:
ALVIN KELLER, Sec. of Corrections, REUBEN YOUNG and KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Corey Woodfolk v. Gary Maynard
as 15-6364
Petitioner - Appellant:
COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, Sec. of Corr., THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and DOUGLAS F. GANSLER
Razzoli v. Attorney General U.S. et al
as 1:2015cv00023
Petitioner:
Kevin Razzoli
Respondent:
Attorney General U.S., Director Of Bureau Of Prisons, Sec. of US Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaidon Blake v. Micheal Ross, Sgt.
as 13-7279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAIDON BLAKE, a/k/a Shamvoy Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MAYNARD, Sec., MICHAEL STOUFFER, Comm. and JAMES MADIGAN
Defendant:
MICHEAL ROSS, Sgt., THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6731
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-7628
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bobby Hairston v. Joel Herron
as 12-6533
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY HAIRSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOEL HERRON, Supt. and ALVIN KELLER, Sec. of Corr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6080
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stepheney v. Publixs Food Store Pharmacys et al
as 1:2011cv03402
Plaintiff:
Wade Stepheney, Jr
Defendant:
Publix's Food Store Pharmacys, SCDCs Director, Commissioners SSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
