Cases 21 - 30 of 135,098
Badger v. Cohen
as 0:2024cv03717
Petitioner:
Jalen Tyrea Badger and Jalen T. Badger
Respondent:
Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Aiken County Sheriffs Office et al
as 8:2024cv03712
Plaintiff:
Jefferey Lurvern Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Aiken County Sheriffs Office and Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Wrongful Death
Thomas v. Artrip
as 7:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Tyshaun Lenard Thomas
Respondent:
Jeffery Artrip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Large et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
C. Large, Parks, K. Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGilton v. Straughn
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brent L.V. McGilton
Defendant:
Shawn Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William McCladdie v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 24-6622
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HERBERT MCCLADDIE
Respondent:
WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Randolph McDowell v. State of Maryland
as 24-6624
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH MCDOWELL
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Tracey Grady v. Eddie Cathey
as 24-6625
Plaintiff:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Defendant:
EDDIE CATHEY, Sheriff, FNU DENNIS, Lieutenant, FNU BAILEY, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
