Cases 21 - 30 of 47
James Johnson v. Pierce
as 16-6142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALEN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PIERCE, Deputy Sheriff and CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, Nurses/Provider
Defendant:
NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL, Sheriff Department
Joey Scott v. Reuben Young
as 15-6908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEY DUANE SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG, ROBERT C. LEWIS, HATTIE PIMPONG and others
James Johnson v. US
as 15-6887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
James Johnson v. US
as 15-6886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Johnson v. Pierce et al
as 2:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
James Alen Johnson
Defendant:
Pierce, Newport News City Jail and Conmed Healthcare Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pronin v. Richardson et al
as 8:2014cv01325
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
Deborah Richardson, Baltimore County, J. F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hollingsworth
as 5:2013hc02225
Petitioner:
James Curtis Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
El-Amin v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv01316
Plaintiff:
Melvin Abdullah El-Amin
Defendant:
James W. Johnson, Officer Ransom #5435, Detective Coahn #4819 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Administration Food Service
as 1:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Administration Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of NC et al
as 5:2013hc02035
Petitioner:
James Artis Johnson
Respondent:
State of NC and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
