Cases 21 - 30 of 651
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hustead v. Indian Creek Correctional Center
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Randall Hustead
Defendant:
Indian Creek Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 7:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Randall James, Jr.
Defendant:
Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Randall Cedis Martin
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lettieri v. Hugnet et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Hugnet and Randall E. Garver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martin v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Randall C. Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGranahan v. City of Hurricane et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
City of Hurricane, Sergeant Poe, Officer Randall Justin Rakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keystone v. USA
as 2:2023cv81542
Petitioner:
Randall J Keystone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Riddick v. VDOC et al
as 7:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
VDOC, Randall C. Mathena, Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
