Cases 21 - 30 of 3,700
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 24-6391
Plaintiff:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant:
PETER T. DANZA, JASON JARMAN, ANTHONY J. TAYLOR and others
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Blackwell v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Matthew Don Blackwell
Defendant:
T. Joseph Stiltner, Jack S. Hurley, Jr. and Unknown Court Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Murphy
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Kevin Punturi, Jermiah Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, Curtis Tate, Peter Buchholte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MILLER
Sterling v. Puryear
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sterling
Defendant:
T. Puryear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
