Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Tillery v. USA
as 3:2014cv00275
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carter Tillery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Terrence Tate v. Billy Martin
as 14-6508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE EDMOND TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY MARTIN, Head of Medical, J. KELLY, Tillery Unit Manager and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
MR. JONES, Physician, MR. JONES, SAMI HASAN and others
Hill v. USA
as 5:2013cv00662
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patricia Tillery Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robert Walden, Jr. v. C/O Lowder
as 11-7288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE WALDEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O LOWDER, Tillery Unit Officer, C/O EURY, Tillery Unit Officer, T. HILDRETH, Tillery Unit Assistant Unit Manager and others
TATE v. JONES
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDMOND TATE
Defendant:
JONES, SAMI HASAN, JENNIFER LANGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Mann et al
as 5:2009ct03071
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Tillery
Defendant:
Charles L. Mann, Sr., Willis J. Fowler, Andrew P. Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Latham, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BENNETT LATHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, FRED SHILLING, Director of Health Services, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
WILLIAMS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv00542
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALTER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUPLIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INST. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Star v. Gene Johnson
as 08-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STAR
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and RUFUS FLEMMING, Regional Director
Defendant - None:
GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden of Greensville Correctional, BATTS, Assistant Warden, ANDERSON, Administrative Assistant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
