Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Watford v. Hamel et al
as 8:2015cv01628
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watford
Defendant:
Jamie Hamel, Christopher Saunders and Steven Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00253
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Temple v. Singleton et al
as 8:2014cv04832
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Temple
Defendant:
James Singleton, Greg Reed, Scott Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould v. Perry et al
as 5:2014ct03314
Plaintiff:
Abdu-Salim Gould
Defendant:
Jeffrey Perry, Sr., Jeffrey Perry, Jr., Jesse Winston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Watford v. Peter Goldman
as 14-7818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE WATFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER L. GOLDMAN, JUDGE WILLIAM CONNELLY, JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE and others
Christopher Cottrell v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EARL COTTRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA Department of Corrections, EDDIE PEARSON, Former Warden of Sussex I Prison, VDOC, DAVID EVERETT, Regional Director, Eastern Office, VDOC and others
Watford v. Goldman et al
as 8:2014cv03105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watford
Defendant:
Peter L. Goldman, William Connelly, Peter J. Messitte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watford v. Koppel et al
as 8:2014cv02738
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Watford
Defendant:
Robert Koppel and Chesepeake Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. United States et al
as 5:2014ct03060
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jomell Perry
Defendant:
United States, George E.B. Holding, Yvonne V. Watford-Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cottrell v. Clarke et al
as 3:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Eddie Pearson, David Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
